W100 Journal Week 6

February 19, 2007

Self-Insertion in Literature (Or Any Media Which Is Not Literature, But Follows a Similar Pattern Nonetheless)

While reading the first few chapters of Charlotte Temple I tried to keep in mind exactly what it was that made this book such a roaring success in the time when it was published. So far, my best guess lies with the preface written my Mrs. Rowson herself. She writes, “The circumstances on which I have founded this novel were related to me some little time since by and old lady who had personally known Charlotte, though she concealed the read names of the characters…” I believe that this preface, whether it was true or not, probably contributed very much to the book’s popularity. It seems to be the case even now that anything with the label “based on a true story” is automatically raised up a notch in the public’s opinion. Consider The Da Vinci Code, which was a huge best-seller just a few years ago, and probably still resides near the top of the lists. Would the book have been so popular had it not began with the very forthright first page stating, Fact Number 1… Fact Number 2…, ect? How many books followed explaining the mysteries of the Knights Templar, The Priori of Sion, or the hidden meanings in da Vinici’s paintings? Personally, I found that to be the most compelling part of the story, the idea that it could be proved historically.

As a prediction for my further reading of the book, I think that the author will probably use a least some refrences to places, people, or customs that readers will relate to, making the story and the characters seem that much more similar to their own experiences, and therefore much more compelling.

Another reason why Charlotte Temple may have held interest for so many readers is the author’s attempts to have the reader immerse themselves in the lives of the characters, and really, to try and become those characters while they are reading. Rowson encourages this mindset in the prolouge saying, “I may have children of my own, said I, to whom this recital may be of use…” By placing herself in the position of the reader, and then further into the position of an empathetic reader, she urges her audience to do the same. This tactic seems very well-executed, and also very effective. The ability of a story to lend itself to self-insertion, or the ability of the reader to imagine themselves in the characters places, is a key component of success.

Entry Filed under: W100 responses, thoughts. .

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. bbarnes  |  February 19, 2007 at 11:26 pm

    I would submit that too many things are leaning on the tagline of “based on a true story” or forms thereof. It’s happening in movies too. It seems as if there is even a remote fact in any work of fiction that it can legally claim use of the tagline.

    You say it raises the public’s opinion up a notch, so what do you think? Should it warrant the popularity?

    Just wondering.

    I would say based in truth or not that it still has to be a good story.

    That is a really interesting question, and actually we were talking about it in our group in class today. The idea of a story being more or less valid called to mind the entire “scandal” surrounding the book “A Million Little Pieces.” Judging by how people reacted then, I’d say that for most people the fact that a story is true does make it more valuable. I disagree. I think that pure fiction can be just as valuable as biography or any real-life based stories. I don’t think the fact that “Charlotte Temple”, or any other book, claims to be based on true events warrants the popularity. I do think, however, that it explains it. ~~Sara

  • 2. Tracy R  |  February 20, 2007 at 1:28 am

    When i was reading the preface and introduction i couldn’t help but think of you, and the class discussion on “What is Literature?”. I’m wondering though, do you think this is literature?

    Based on my argument at the time then, yes, I would consider this literature. Remember, I was suggesting that literature could be defined by what is studied in an academic setting. Clearly this would qualify. Of course, I didn’t say that I did define literature that way, only that I could. :) ~~Sara

  • 3. Prof. Matt  |  February 20, 2007 at 6:51 am

    (Or Any Media Which Is Not Literature, But Follows a Similar Pattern Nonetheless)

    Such as a blog post, perhaps?

  • 4. sosheehan  |  February 20, 2007 at 6:44 pm

    Ha. I can’t claim that that is what I was thinking of when I wrote that, but I suppose it’s possible. Mostly I was just trying to be tongue-in-cheek. :)

  • 5. Prof. Matt  |  February 20, 2007 at 11:34 pm

    It seems very fortuitous that we happen to be reading Charlotte Temple just as class members are starting to write blogs. Given the novel’s explicit concern with its audience — with reaching out and speaking directly to its readers — I think that it’s a perfect fit for our entry into a medium based on the idea of finding new avenues of publication and conversation.

    In fact, I’m trying to think right now of some blog-related projects related to Charlotte Temple that we might think about trying . . . stay tuned!

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


del.icio.us

a

Archives

Blogroll

Blog Stats